Seditious Blasphemer

FROM: http://www.prisonplanet.com/rush-limbaugh-censors-mention-of-prison-planet-from-his-own-archives.html

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Friday, November 20, 2009

Neo-Con talk show host Rush Limbaugh has sensationally censored any mention of Prison Planet.com from his own transcript archives after he discussed a story we had posted yesterday about Al Gore using Photoshop to insert fake hurricanes into the cover of his new book on global warming.

The original transcript posted on Limbaugh’s website accurately carried the statements he made on his show yesterday, which included the words, “And the website where this is taken place is PrisonPlanet.com.”

The transcript page also featured an image of Limbaugh with a screenshot of the Prison Planet logo behind him.

However, both the Prison Planet logo and Limbaugh’s mention of the website, owned by Texas radio host Alex Jones, have since been “memory-holed” from the Limbaugh archives.

Limbaugh originally featured a huge link at the top of his website to Prison Planet, but all links have now been deleted from the archives.
In the new version of the transcript, the words, “And the website where this is taken place is PrisonPlanet.com,” have been culled, despite the fact Limbaugh clearly said them, as can be verified via the You Tube clip at the bottom of this page.

Any links to the Prison Planet.com story, which were prominently featured all over Limbaugh’s website, have also been deleted and replaced with a similar story by Newsbusters, a Neo-Con news website.

What caused Limbaugh to order the material removed? Our guess is that he was probably bombarded with e mails from the legions of virulently retarded Neo-Cons that make up the audience of phony right-wing websites like Free Republic, on which all Alex Jones material is aggressively banned.

It’s highly unlikely that Limbaugh ordered his webmaster to link to Prison Planet.com by mistake, he knows who we are because he’s attacked us on several occasions before. But any hopes that Limbaugh may be abandoning his Neo-Con base and coming across to the Ron Paul/Libertarian perspective appear to be dashed.

As one of our forum members put it, “I knew I was too optimistic to think that Limbaugh may have had a conscience.”

Loading mentions Retweet

Current chairman of the private Federal Reserve Ben Bernanke made a visit to Chicago on June 10th.  He was unexpectedely confronted by patriots and members of We Are Change Chicago regarding his treasonous attendance at Bilderburg in 2008.

Loading mentions Retweet

P.S. And BTW, when CNN sits there making a point to say several times there are no internment or concentration camps here in the U.S., that's 110% Bull Sh!t.  I just got done watching the extremely hard hitting movie "Camp FEMA" and I couldn't sleep for 2 friggin days. It is that bad, it's really happening, and it's for the American public. Look for yourself.

What does it mean when the talking heads on 24 hour cable news networks spin the fact that members of www.OathKeepers.org, are patriotic US Military, Police, and Law enforcement personnel that are reaffirming the very oath they took in to first place... portraying them as dangerous radical extremists?

Well, I don't know what that means (*cough, cough*) exactly.  Are the discredited Main Stream Media and their elitist masters getting worried about something?

Doing hit pieces on The Oathkeepers for pledging to uphold and defend the Constitution and Bill of Rights from all enemies, foreign AND domestic, even drawing attention to "Fall of the Republic" after it's director has been banned from CNN forever. I sense something...

--Seditious Blasphemer
Sedition, Sorcery, and Blasphemy

Loading mentions Retweet

by

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars
November 3, 2008

A new video has surfaced clearly showing the demolition of WTC Building 7.

In its latest report, the National Institute of Standards and Technology attempted to once and for all put to rest the evidence that the building was taken down via demolition by explaining that fires had caused the collapse. Specifically, NIST claimed "thermal expansion" had brought about the collapse. As Trish Stevens notes, the NIST report "is contrary to all historical, visual, and physical evidence, according to an independent worldwide organization composed of more than 470 engineers and architects. WTC-7 was a 47-story skyscraper located more than a football field away from the North Tower and was not hit by any airplane, yet completely collapsed hours after the Twin Towers fell in a similar manner."

Dr. Steven Jones says there is "an abundance of evidence which NIST refuses to look at or even account for that clearly points to controlled demolition as the source that destroyed these buildings."

As the new video clearly reveals, the center supporting columns of the 47-story building were taken out, allowing the building to collapse into its footprint in a symmetrical, straight down fashion. "This is controlled demolition," averred demolitions expert Danny Jowenko in 2006. "A team of experts did this. This is professional work, without any doubt."

In 2007, a 9/11 first responder went on the record to describe how he heard a demolition-style countdown precede the collapse of WTC 7. "Earlier this year, we reported on the testimony of an anonymous EMT named Mike who told Loose Change producer Dylan Avery that hundreds of emergency rescue personnel were told over bullhorns that Building 7, a 47 story skyscraper adjacent the twin towers that was not hit by a plane yet imploded symmetrically later in the afternoon on 9/11, was about to be 'pulled' and that a 20 second radio countdown preceded its collapse," writes Paul Joseph Watson. "That account was backed up by another ground zero rescue worker who went on the record with her full name. Volunteer EMT Indira Singh described to a radio show how she learned that WTC 7 was going to be 'brought down' and the context was clear that it was to be deliberately demolished."

"The whole time you're hearing boom, boom, boom, boom, boom. I think I know an explosion when I hear it," NYPD officer Craig Bartmer revealed last year. Bartmer stated his incredulity at how fast the Building 7 site was cleaned up compared to the rest of ground zero.

In addition, other ground zero emergency workers have gone on record as stating they were told Building 7 was to be "pulled." An anonymous source, identified simply as "Mike," told Loose Change producer Dylan Avery that hundreds of emergency rescue personnel were told over bullhorns that Building 7 was to be brought down.

An yet, if we are to believe NIST and FEMA, fires are responsible for the classical demolition of the building. Now that we have a video that clearly and irrefutably shows that Building 7 was indeed brought down by demolition, the response of NIST and FEMA will be interesting.

Technorati Tags: VIDEO , Building , 7 , Collapse , Demolition , 9/11 , NIST , thermal , expansion , wtc-7 , north , tower , airplane , twin , towers , destroyed ,

Loading mentions Retweet